11/3/17
15/1/17
Policía secreta Colombiana (D.A.S.) - Capítulo 1
Capítulo 1: Manual de tortura psicológica a mujeres
"Si contáramos lo que sucede aquí día tras día la gente no podría dormir" - Jorge Noguera, Ex-director del D.A.S.
(Edición No. 4.533 Revista Cromos, 10 de enero 2005)
- Objetivo: Amenazar a Clara Julieta Duque.
- Método: Presión, tortura psicológica.
- Recomendaciones:
- Hacer la llamada en cercanía a las instalaciones de inteligencia de la Policía.
- No tartamudear, ni durar en la llamada más de 49 segundos.
- Llamar preferiblemente desde un teléfono de ETB de tarjeta, en caso de que inmediatamente devulevan la llamada.
- Constatar que en el perímetro no hayan cámaras de seguridad, así sean de tránsito.
- Quien realice la llamada debe hacerlo solo y desplazarse en bus hasta el sitio.
- Extremar las medidas preventivas dado que Claudia Julieta avisará inmediatamente de la llamada al Coronel Novoa de la Policía Nacional (Mismo que en otras oportunidades nos ha afectado institucionalmente).
- Mensaje:
"Señora es usted la mamá de ----------- --------- (esperar contestación) Pues le cuento que no nos dejó otra salida, se le dijo de todas las formas y usted no quiso hacer caso, ahora ni camionetas blindadas ni carticas chimbas le van a servir, nos tocó meternos con lo que más quiere, eso le pasa por perra y por meterse en lo que no le importa vieja gonorrea hijueputa."
"Fue tal la sevicia que el DAS se especializó en la técnica del acoso y la presión psicológica para torturar a través de amenazas cuidadosamente tejidas siguiendo el tenebroso libreto de un instrutcivo."
J. Martinez, "Chuzadas ocho años de espionaje y barbarie", 2a Edición 2016, Ediciones B Colombia. Página 13.
J. Martinez, "Chuzadas ocho años de espionaje y barbarie", 2a Edición 2016, Ediciones B Colombia. Página 13.
¿Por qué te juntas con esa gente rara?
¿por que te juntas con ellos?
Son el tipo de acusaciones y preguntas que me hacen día a día, donde mi respuesta realmente no vale, solo puedo decir que de una manera me siento identificado con ellos... Solo puedo decir que de verdad seria una experiencia conocerlos mas a fondo, mas que una experiencia un universo de travesías que te harán comprender que detrás de ese estilo solo hay personas hambrientas del conocimiento explicito, como si de la desnudez se tratase. Te puedo afirmar muchas cosas, como que de sus locuras solo nacen genialidades, que pueden convertir un "simple" COB (chip on board) en un sinfín de posibilidades, pueden romper esos esquemas, esos margenes, pueden salirse de la linea limite a colorear, solo para experimentar una y otra vez ese sabor agridulce del fracaso. Créeme todo esto lo hacen para saltar esas barreras del protocolo impuestas por sistemas y normas que de una u otra manera, siempre están dispuestas a ser mejoradas(?). Pueden mostrar que en toda esa fachada des-complicada encaminan nuevos horizontes solo para decirte en la cara lo tan errado que puedes estar sin ningún complique sentimental, lo tan mal que puede estar configurado tu Apache o NAS solo para que lo mejores. Esa comunidad de chicos raros sin generalizar, son juzgados por el simple hecho de tener ideales que van mas allá del típico modelo escolar alienado por esos "sistemas útiles" en nuestra sociedad donde "La Matrix" (The Matrix - Hiddenwiki) solo se encarga de manipular a su antojo lo económicamente olfateable. Día a día solo juzgamos por lo que vemos mas no por lo que experimentamos y es triste que juzgues a esas personas que forman comunidades para compartir el libre conocimiento del que te jactas cuando utilizas P2P o Y*hoo Respuestas. Debes recordar que facebook, reddit, entre otros han sido creados por estos "marginados", Mira mas allá de la estupida interfaz... Explora más a fondo el basto backend del saber.
Cifra tus sentidos. Programa tus ideas.
//MaztoR
5/11/16
Guerilla Open Access Manifesto
Guerilla Open Access Manifesto
Information is power. But like all power, there are those who want to keep it for
themselves. The world's entire scientific and cultural heritage, published over centuries
in books and journals, is increasingly being digitized and locked up by a handful of
private corporations. Want to read the papers featuring the most famous results of the
sciences? You'll need to send enormous amounts to publishers like Reed Elsevier.
There are those struggling to change this. The Open Access Movement has fought
valiantly to ensure that scientists do not sign their copyrights away but instead ensure
their work is published on the Internet, under terms that allow anyone to access it. But
even under the best scenarios, their work will only apply to things published in the future.
Everything up until now will have been lost.
That is too high a price to pay. Forcing academics to pay money to read the work of their
colleagues? Scanning entire libraries but only allowing the folks at Google to read them?
Providing scientific articles to those at elite universities in the First World, but not to
children in the Global South? It's outrageous and unacceptable.
"I agree," many say, "but what can we do? The companies hold the copyrights, they
make enormous amounts of money by charging for access, and it's perfectly legal —
there's nothing we can do to stop them." But there is something we can, something that's
already being done: we can fight back.
Those with access to these resources — students, librarians, scientists — you have been
given a privilege. You get to feed at this banquet of knowledge while the rest of the world
is locked out. But you need not — indeed, morally, you cannot — keep this privilege for
yourselves. You have a duty to share it with the world. And you have: trading passwords
with colleagues, filling download requests for friends.
Meanwhile, those who have been locked out are not standing idly by. You have been
sneaking through holes and climbing over fences, liberating the information locked up by
the publishers and sharing them with your friends.
But all of this action goes on in the dark, hidden underground. It's called stealing or
piracy, as if sharing a wealth of knowledge were the moral equivalent of plundering a
ship and murdering its crew. But sharing isn't immoral — it's a moral imperative. Only
those blinded by greed would refuse to let a friend make a copy.
Large corporations, of course, are blinded by greed. The laws under which they operate
require it — their shareholders would revolt at anything less. And the politicians they
have bought off back them, passing laws giving them the exclusive power to decide who
can make copies.
There is no justice in following unjust laws. It's time to come into the light and, in the
grand tradition of civil disobedience, declare our opposition to this private theft of public
culture.
We need to take information, wherever it is stored, make our copies and share them with
the world. We need to take stuff that's out of copyright and add it to the archive. We need
to buy secret databases and put them on the Web. We need to download scientific
journals and upload them to file sharing networks. We need to fight for Guerilla Open
Access.
With enough of us, around the world, we'll not just send a strong message opposing the
privatization of knowledge — we'll make it a thing of the past. Will you join us?
Aaron Swartz
July 2008, Eremo, Italy
FUENTE
Information is power. But like all power, there are those who want to keep it for
themselves. The world's entire scientific and cultural heritage, published over centuries
in books and journals, is increasingly being digitized and locked up by a handful of
private corporations. Want to read the papers featuring the most famous results of the
sciences? You'll need to send enormous amounts to publishers like Reed Elsevier.
There are those struggling to change this. The Open Access Movement has fought
valiantly to ensure that scientists do not sign their copyrights away but instead ensure
their work is published on the Internet, under terms that allow anyone to access it. But
even under the best scenarios, their work will only apply to things published in the future.
Everything up until now will have been lost.
That is too high a price to pay. Forcing academics to pay money to read the work of their
colleagues? Scanning entire libraries but only allowing the folks at Google to read them?
Providing scientific articles to those at elite universities in the First World, but not to
children in the Global South? It's outrageous and unacceptable.
"I agree," many say, "but what can we do? The companies hold the copyrights, they
make enormous amounts of money by charging for access, and it's perfectly legal —
there's nothing we can do to stop them." But there is something we can, something that's
already being done: we can fight back.
Those with access to these resources — students, librarians, scientists — you have been
given a privilege. You get to feed at this banquet of knowledge while the rest of the world
is locked out. But you need not — indeed, morally, you cannot — keep this privilege for
yourselves. You have a duty to share it with the world. And you have: trading passwords
with colleagues, filling download requests for friends.
Meanwhile, those who have been locked out are not standing idly by. You have been
sneaking through holes and climbing over fences, liberating the information locked up by
the publishers and sharing them with your friends.
But all of this action goes on in the dark, hidden underground. It's called stealing or
piracy, as if sharing a wealth of knowledge were the moral equivalent of plundering a
ship and murdering its crew. But sharing isn't immoral — it's a moral imperative. Only
those blinded by greed would refuse to let a friend make a copy.
Large corporations, of course, are blinded by greed. The laws under which they operate
require it — their shareholders would revolt at anything less. And the politicians they
have bought off back them, passing laws giving them the exclusive power to decide who
can make copies.
There is no justice in following unjust laws. It's time to come into the light and, in the
grand tradition of civil disobedience, declare our opposition to this private theft of public
culture.
We need to take information, wherever it is stored, make our copies and share them with
the world. We need to take stuff that's out of copyright and add it to the archive. We need
to buy secret databases and put them on the Web. We need to download scientific
journals and upload them to file sharing networks. We need to fight for Guerilla Open
Access.
With enough of us, around the world, we'll not just send a strong message opposing the
privatization of knowledge — we'll make it a thing of the past. Will you join us?
Aaron Swartz
July 2008, Eremo, Italy
FUENTE
18/9/16
¿Por qué no hay mujeres en la cultura hacker?
Pareciera
que cada cierto tiempo tenemos que recordarlo y recordárnoslo. El mito
estereotípico de la hacker como una mujer antisocial, a veces como
bandida digital poniendo en evidencia a los poderes, otras como pirata
(en su acepción buena y mala) pero la mayoría de las veces como una
agente molesta que “roba” información ya sea para chantajear, hacerse
famosa y/o rica se convierte en un insulto.